Local News
Eyewitness Sports
Medical Coverage
Call For Action
More Details
What's On WPRI
What's On Fox
2 Minute Test Drive
Experts Online
Online Store
Chopper 12
Station Info

MARKETPLACE:  Auto | Jobs | People Search | Personals | Travel | Yellow Pages  November 16, 2004
Education | House & Home | Money | Pets | Recipes | Relationships | What's Next | More Topics...
MRI Spots Breast Tumors in High-Risk Women
Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version  

By E.J. Mundell, HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, July 28 (HealthDayNews) -- For a small subset of women with a genetic or family predisposition for breast cancer, regular MRI breast screening may be the best way to spot tumors early.

Breast MRIs conducted annually were nearly 80 percent effective in picking up invasive cancers in high-risk women, compared to the 33 percent effectiveness rating of annual mammographies, Dutch researchers report in the July 29 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

However, experts agree that MRI's high rate of false positive results -- findings that could be malignant tumors, but turn out to be benign -- make the technology much less desirable for women at normal breast cancer risk.

While regular MRI breast scans may be of benefit to women at high risk, "women at normal risk should not be encouraged to undergo regular MRI screening," said study author Dr. Jan G. M. Klijn, a medical oncologist at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic.

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death among American women. While mammography is moderately effective in spotting tumors, a small percentage of women -- such as those carrying the BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast cancer genes -- may need screening technologies with even greater powers of detection.

"In their lifetime, 50 to 85 percent of these women will develop breast cancer," explained Dr. Laura Liberman, attending radiologist in the Breast Imaging Section at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

Liberman, who wrote an editorial accompanying the Dutch study, said that for these women, an annual mammogram just isn't enough. "So, people are now studying supplementary techniques, such as MRI," she said.

In their study, Klijn's team selected 1,909 adult women who were either carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, or who had a strong family history of breast cancer -- defined as close relatives diagnosed with breast tumors before age 30.

All of the women received clinical breast exams every six months, plus mammography and MRI screening annually, over the course of three years.

Fifty-two breast cancers were detected among the group during the study period, the researchers report. In terms of early detection, MRI far outperformed mammography or clinical breast exams, with detection rates calculated at 79.5 percent, 33.3 percent and 17.9 percent, respectively. MRI was also much better at detecting very small tumors (10 millimeters or less in diameter) at a very early stage.

Based on the findings, Klijn said, "our recommendations are to use MRI as a screening method in specialized facilities, for women with a BRCA 1/2 mutation or a really high risk of breast cancer."

Both Klijn and Liberman are careful to not extend this recommendation to women at average risk, however.

Liberman explained that, besides the scarcity and high cost of MRI, the technology's strength -- its ability to spot very tiny abnormalities in tissue -- is also a weakness.

"This is a very sensitive test -- if there's a cancer hiding in the breast, it's likely to show up," she said. "But as a tool it's also not very specific -- meaning that a lot of normal stuff will light up, too."

That may be acceptable for the anywhere from 1 percent to 10 percent of women at very high risk for breast cancer, she said. For these women, "if you have a positive result, the likelihood that it's a [a tumor] is so much higher" that it may be worth going to the next step, which is biopsy, Liberman explained.

On the other hand, MRI's high false-positive rate "would simply cause a lot of anxiety and then lead to a lot of unnecessary, benign biopsies if we started to apply it as a screening test in the general population," she said. "There's just no evidence that it's a helpful screening test in women at normal risk."

More information

Learn about the early detection of the disease from the American Cancer Society (www.cancer.org ).

SOURCES: Jan G. M. Klijn, M.D., Ph.D., professor, medical oncology, and chairman, Rotterdam Family Clinic Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Laura Liberman, attending radiologist, Breast Imaging Section, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; July 29, 2004, New England Journal of Medicine

Copyright � 2004 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

Health News | Health Encyclopedia | Quizzes and Tools | Women's Health | Men's Health | Children's Health | Seniors' Health | Diet, Fitness and Self Image | Sex and Relationships
Women's Health News  more» 
Woman Gives Surprise Insight Into Hot Flashes
Chemo OK for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer
Quick Questionnaire Can ID Tamoxifen Candidates
Exercise May Beat Breast Cancer in the Long Run
Radiation Not Always Needed for Breast Cancer
Age, Tumor Stage Affect Breast Cancer Death
Mammograms Point to Better Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients
Antifungal Keeps Yeast Infections at Bay
Sugary Drinks Tied to Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes
MRI Spots Breast Tumors in High-Risk Women
Health Encyclopedia: Women's Health
Dilatation And Curettage (D and C)
Breast Calcifications
Tubal Ligation
Vaginal Prolapse
Postpartum Depression
Prenatal Care
Prolapsed Uterus
Ovarian Cysts

Turkey Day is Coming
Plan your menu with the help of your community's favorite recipes.
Smile Maintenance
Your smile says a lot about you. Is it saying the right thing?
Send questions and comments about this website to the .
All content © Copyright 2004 WorldNow, WPRI, WNAC and Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.