Eyewitness News
Local News
Weather
Eyewitness Sports
HealthBeat
Call For Action
Investigators
Technology
Entertainment
Community
What's On WPRI
What's On Fox
Feedback
Contests
Station Info
Online Store



MARKETPLACE:  Auto | Jobs | Personals | Yellow Pages  January 22, 2004
LIFESTYLE: 
Valentine's Day | House & Home | Money | Pets | Recipes | Relationships | Travel | Weddings
Screening Newborns
Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version  

(Ivanhoe Newswire) -- New research shows screening newborns for biochemical genetic disorders may improve a child's outcome and reduce stress in parents. However, researchers say false-positive screening results may increase stress levels in parents.

Previously, screening for genetic disorders required a separate test, but now, doctors can screen for up to 20 genetic disorders with just one sample of blood by using a device called the tandem mass spectrometry. Currently, 24 states are using the expanded newborn screening test. Researchers from Children's Hospital in Boston conducted a study to determine how screening for biochemical genetic disorders affects newborns and their families.

Researchers interviewed more than 250 mothers and more than 150 fathers who had children with genetic disorders, which were identified either clinically or by using expanded newborn screening. Overall, 50 affected children had been identified through expanded newborn screening, and 33 affected children were identified clinically. Some of the parents studied received false-positive newborn screening results. A false-positive result was defined as initial out-of-range screening results that did not signify a disorder upon further evaluation.

Results of the study show, within the first six months of life, 28 percent of children with genetic disorders who were identified with expanded newborn screening required hospitalization. In contrast, 55 percent of children clinically identified with genetic disorders required hospitalization. Researchers also say only one child identified by newborn screening, compared with eight identified clinically, performed in the range of mental retardation.

Results also show mothers in the screened group reported lower overall stress than those in the clinically identified group. Children with false-positive results were twice as likely to be hospitalized than those with normal results. Mothers of children in the false-positive group also reported higher stress levels.

Authors of the study conclude, "This study highlights some of the challenges to current newborn screening practices. It demonstrates a need for education about newborn screening for parents prior to the birth of their child."

This article was reported by Ivanhoe.com, who offers Medical Alerts by e-mail every day of the week. To subscribe, go to: http://www.ivanhoe.com/newsalert/.

SOURCE: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2003;290:2564-2572

Health News | Health Encyclopedia | Quizzes and Tools | Women's Health | Men's Health | Children's Health | Seniors' Health | Diet, Fitness and Self Image | Sex and Relationships
Health Encyclopedia: Children's Health
Insect Bites And Stings
Immunizations - Child
Umbilical Hernia In Infants
Precocious Puberty
Reye's Syndrome
Measles
Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Whooping Cough
Tietze's Syndrome (Costochondritis)
Seizures In Children
Children's Health News
Study Endorses Intensive Phobia Treatment for Children
Teacher Response to Sick Kids
New Study Reinforces SIDS Prevention Guidelines
Employers Slashing Retiree Health Benefits
Veterans Showed Fewer Stress Symptoms After 9/11: Study
Choking and Children
Different Types of Asthma
Gender Difference in Insulin Resistance
Secondhand Smoke Affects Sickle Cell
Single Antibiotic Dose Best for Kids with Stem Cell Transplants

Is it the Flu?
Find out in the Family Flu Center.
About that raise...
Someone's getting one. Why not you?
Valentine's Day
Gifts, recipes, date ideas & more.
2004 Resolutions:
Find a job. Meet new people. Get healthy.
Send questions and comments about this website to the .
All content © Copyright 2004 WorldNow, WPRI, WNAC and Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.