Home
Local News
Weather
Eyewitness Sports
Medical Coverage
Call 12 For Action
Target 12 Investigators
More Details
Technology
Entertainment
Community
What's On WPRI
What's On Fox
This Morning Weekend
Contests
Experts Online
Feedback
Online Store
Chopper 12
Station Info



 May 12, 2005
Silicone Breast Implants Prone to Rupture, Report Tells FDA
Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version  

Up to 93 percent of silicone breast implants rupture within 10 years, health regulators estimated in a report to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is considering allowing the implants' return to the market.

An FDA advisory panel is set to convene Monday to pore over recent studies of the implants' safety, and to hear testimony of women who have had the devices, The New York Times reported Thursday.

In estimating the 10-year rupture rate, the reviewers assumed that the devices were more likely to break as they aged. Without that assumption, the estimated rate would be about 21 percent over 10 years, the newspaper said.

The FDA panel is expected to decide by April 13 whether to recommend re-approving the implants for wider use. In 1992, silicone use was restricted to a very small number of women who participated in studies that investigated a slew of claims that the implants caused a number of connective-tissue and autoimmune diseases.

While the FDA usually supports the suggestions of its expert panels, the agency balked at giving the implants the green light the last time it considered the issue. In October 2003, the expert panel voted 9-6 to bring the implants back. But the panel's chairman wrote a letter to the agency advising that more study was needed, and the FDA ultimately sided with the chairman, the Times said.

The advisory panel will reconsider three primary issues relating to the implants: how often they break, what happens to the silicone once they do rupture, and what health effects result, the newspaper said.

A separate expert committee of scientists met in 1999 and found that there was no evidence to support claims that the implants caused disease. Rather, the panel found, side effects were generally limited to local complications like infections, pain and scarring, the Times reported.

-----

Copyright � 2005 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

Health News | Health Encyclopedia | Quizzes and Tools | Women's Health | Men's Health | Children's Health | Seniors' Health | Diet, Fitness and Self Image | Sex and Relationships

Women's Health News  more» 
Glaxo Corrects Defects in Two Drugs
Air Pollution Levels Drop Across U.S.
Fewer U.S. Counties Record Unhealthy Air Pollution Levels
Senate to Consider Tightened Abortion Restrictions
E-mails Suggest Merck May Have Known of Vioxx's Risks: Report
Dutch Woman Diagnosed With Mad Cow
Vaccine Preservative Not as Dangerous as Claimed: Study
Anti-epileptic Kits Recalled for Dosing Error
Lasers Can Repair Most Causes of Varicose Veins
Delta Airlines Giving Electronic Passenger Lists to CDC
Health Encyclopedia: Women's Health
Headache And Food
Headache
Migraine
Cluster Headaches
Dilatation And Curettage (DandC)
Breast Calcifications
Vaginal Prolapse
Prenatal Care
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI, Cystitis)
Prolapsed Uterus
 
Send questions and comments about this website to the .
All content © Copyright 2003-2005 WorldNow, WPRI, WNAC and Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.